Exhibition - Internal Assessment
Exhibition
40% of IB Final Grade
Students submit for assessment a selection of resolved artworks for their exhibition. The selected pieces should show evidence of their technical accomplishment during the visual arts course and an understanding of the use of materials, ideas and practices to realize their intentions. Students also evidence the decision-making process which underpins the selection of this connected and cohesive body of work for an audience in the form of a curatorial rationale.
During the course students will have learned the skills and techniques necessary to produce their own independent artwork in a variety of media. In order to prepare for assessment in this component, students will select the required number of pieces to best match the task requirements and demonstrate their highest achievement. HL Students select 8–11 artworks for submission. The final presentation of the work is assessed in the context of the presentation as a whole (including the accompanying text) by the teacher against the task assessment criteria.
Task details
For the exhibition task students at SL and HL should select and present their own original resolved artworks which best evidences:
SL - 5-8 Pieces
HL - 8-11 Pieces
technical competence
appropriate use of materials, techniques, processes • resolution, communicating the stated intentions of the pieces
cohesiveness
breadth and depth
consideration for the overall experience of the viewer (through exhibition, display or presentation).
Students will be assessed on their technical accomplishment, the conceptual strength of their work and the resolution of their stated intentions. To support their selected resolved artworks, students at SL and HL must also submit:
exhibition text which states the title, medium, size and a brief outline of the original intentions of each selected artwork
two photographs of their overall exhibition. While the photographs will not be used to assess individual artworks, they may give the moderator insight into how a student has considered the overall experience of the viewer in their exhibition. Only the selected artworks submitted for assessment should appear in the exhibition photographs.
Students at HL must also develop a curatorial rationale which accompanies their original artworks (700 words maximum). This rationale explains the intentions of the student and how they have considered the presentation of work using curatorial methodologies, as well as considering the potential relationship between the artworks and the viewer.
Structuring the exhibition
It is expected that work developed for the exhibition will overlap or have grown from initial or in-depth investigations within part 1: comparative study and part 2: process portfolio.
Work developed for the exhibition will have been carefully supported and facilitated by both teacher-directed learning activities and independent studies by the student. In preparing for this task students will need to have engaged with a variety of skills, techniques and processes that will have enabled them to manipulate materials, media, techniques and processes in order to discover strengths and work towards technical excellence.
Art-making forms
Having worked within a range of art-making forms for part 2: process portfolio, students at both SL and HL may submit work created in any preferred art-making form for part 3: exhibition. The submitted pieces must be selected by the student from their total body of resolved works and should represent their most successful achievements against the assessment criteria. They should be presented in a manner suitable for an audience.

Exhibition text (500 characters maximum per artwork)
Each submitted artwork should be supported by exhibition text which outlines the title, medium and size of the artwork. The exhibition text should also include a brief outline of the original intentions of the work (500 characters maximum per artwork). The exhibition text must contain reference to any sources which have influenced the individual piece. Students should indicate if objects are self-made, found or purchased within the “medium” section of the exhibition text, where applicable. Where students are deliberately appropriating another artist’s image as a valid part of their art-making intentions, the exhibition text must acknowledge the source of the original image.
Collective pieces
Students are required to submit individual artworks for assessment. Where students wish to submit portions of work in the form of one collective piece (such as diptych, triptych, polyptych or series), this must be clearly stated as part of the title of the submitted piece in the exhibition text, presented in parentheses. For example: Title of the piece (diptych). The requirements for capturing and submitting collective pieces is the same as with other standard submissions, however students deciding to submit collective pieces need to be aware that there is a compromise in the size an image can be viewed when submitted as part of a collective piece which may prevent examiners from taking details that cannot be seen into account. Collective pieces that are presented without the appropriate exhibition text will be considered as distinct artworks and could lead to a student exceeding the maximum number of pieces.
Writing a Curatorial Rationale
How to write your curatorial rational.
This where you explain to the examiner the context to your art. Refer to your visual art journal to write this.
Provide a context and vision for the work to help the examiner to understand the exhibition.
This will include artists, ideas, & themes that have influenced you.
Describe how particular issues, motifs or ideas been explored, or particular materials or techniques used.
Explain the connecting threads that link the ideas in your exhibition.
You can explain any challenges, innovations, initiatives that have impacted on your selection and presentation.
You will explain why you have chosen to exhibit these artworks and why you have shown them in this way.
This should include connections and relationship between artwork presented
You will explain how your exhibition fulfills your intentions and communicates thematic or stylistic relationships across individual pieces.
What strategies did you use to develop a relationship between the artwork and the viewer; for example, visual impact?
If you are taking HL you also need to explain:
How the arrangement and presentation of artworks contributes to the audience experience.
How will the viewer interpret and understand the intentions and meanings of the exhibition.
Avoid
Giving a chronological account of the development of your artworks
Duplicating the exhibition texts
Ensure that you consider the audience:
How will the audience approach the works?
What will they see first?
How will they engage with the artworks?
How have you used the space?
You might discuss: Scale, lighting.
What do you want the viewer experience to be? How have you achieved this?
Start with a short sentence that tells the examiner what is going to happen and engages their interest.
Examples:
“My exhibition considers the nature of portraiture with specific focus on my family.”
“My exhibition explores identity and divide, within my personal life and then confronting global issues”
“In this exhibition, I explore architectural forms with emphasis on the intersection of line in combination with simple, undisturbed forms.”
“The theme of my exhibition is identity and exploring what makes one self.”
“My exhibition has been through changes in thematic intention but has gravitated towards the human form as a recurrent motif.”
“Growing up in Hong Kong, I found inspiration in the back alleys and by observing buildings from obscure points of view.
Word toolbox:
Audience, viewer, the viewer/audience experience, engage, experience, kinetic (as relating to moving around art works), my intentions, the focus, display, present, show, contrast, juxtapose, link, make connections, draw the audience in, make people look closely, shock, surprise, challenge.
